Company research
- Metric
- -60%GitHub commits
- Measured values
- 18 vs 45Jul 12 vs Jun 12
- Sources
- 2 sourcesGitHub API + TechCrunch · as of July 13, 2026
- Cited source
- TechCrunchDatabricks’ former AI chief thinks he can cut AI’s power bill by 1,000x · Jun 25
In TechCrunch, "Databricks’ former AI chief thinks he can cut AI’s power bill by 1,000x"; separately, Replicate's GitHub commits decreased 60% over the last 30 days, with GitHub data through Jul 12.
What this does not prove: Does not show adoption, revenue, market share, company-wide engineering output, product progress, model progress, private usage, private repositories, or non-default branches.
Metric receipt (2 sources)
Measured public metric
- GitHub API: Replicate GitHub commits · July 12, 2026
Cited source
- TechCrunch: Databricks’ former AI chief thinks he can cut AI’s power bill by 1,000x · June 25, 2026
- MetricMetric: GitHub commitsDefinition: Repository commit count for the UTC activity day from GitHub REST/search, GH Archive PushEvent evidence, or retained provider snapshots.Source: GitHub APIScope: Trailing 30 daysUpdates: DailyFreshness: 48h target; 24h expected source lagConfidence: MediumCaveat: Default-branch commits for designated public repos per company.
- GitHub commits
- Observed window
- Last 30 days (2026-06-12 to 2026-07-12)
- Comparison
- Compared with the prior reading
- Start value
- 45 on 2026-06-12
- End value
- 18 on 2026-07-12
- Calculation
- ((18 - 45) / 45) * 100 = -60%
- Metric receipt
- Retained AI-Buzz metric receipt; not externally reproducible from a single public URL.
- Relationship
- Cited sources provide context and do not prove they caused the measured metric change.
Use this card
Copy the dated citation or a compact metric summary after checking the receipt and source links.