Compare AutoGen (Microsoft) and Harvey AI across package adoption, contributors, funding, and discussion signals. Both compete in AI Agents. Updated daily with live metrics.
At a glance
Data sources: npm, PyPI, GitHub, Crunchbase, Hacker News, Reddit, job boards. Methodology →
Latest comparable sync April 4, 2026Evidence Table
Production signals first, softer context second. Winner states are explicit, and weak or missing data stays visible instead of being rounded away.
← Scroll to compare columns →
| Signal | Current edge | Updated Apr 4 | Updated Apr 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
Adoption & EcosystemThese signals carry the most weight for a production default. | |||
| Momentum | Current edge Harvey AI only | - | 31 Moderate |
| Total package downloads (30d)Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managersMethodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 57.9K +62% (2 packages) | Not tracked |
| npm registry downloads (30d)Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 0 | Not tracked |
| PyPI registry downloads (30d)Source: PyPI (pypistats.org)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 57.9K (2 packages) | Not tracked |
| Package dependentsSource: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Counts dependent packages across tracked npm and PyPI packages.Methodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 75 npm 0 · PyPI 75 | Not tracked |
| Active contributors/daySource: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activityMethodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 1 | Not tracked |
| Code adoption (repos)Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksMethodology →Exclusive | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 0 | Not tracked |
Community & AttentionHelpful context, but weaker than the adoption rows above. | |||
| GitHub starsSource: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks - a popularity signal, not a usage indicatorMethodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) only | 56.6K | Not tracked |
| Hacker News mentions (30d)Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyMethodology → | Current edge Even | 0 | 0 |
| HN discussion shareSource: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of Hacker News mentions within the company's primary category.Methodology → | Current edge Harvey AI only | Not tracked | 0.5% |
Company DurabilityCapital and financing history provide context, not the whole call. | |||
| Total disclosed fundingSource: Public records / manual researchUpdates: WeeklyMethodology → | Current edge Harvey AI only | Not disclosed | $206M |
| Last funding round | Current edge Harvey AI only | Not disclosed | Series C Jul 2024 |
Data TrustCoverage and freshness stay visible instead of being hidden by the narrative. | |||
| Data confidenceSource: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Composite score based on field completeness, metric freshness, and identifier coverage.Methodology → | Current edge Harvey AI +15 pts | Good (73%) | Excellent (88%) No tracked packages |
| Signals trackedSource: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Number of tracked non-null signals in the core compare dataset.Methodology → | Current edge AutoGen (Microsoft) +3 | 3/7 adoption, attention, and trust signals | 0/7 adoption, attention, and trust signals |
| Latest sync | Current edge Same | Apr 4, 2026 | Apr 4, 2026 |
Harvey AI: no tracked npm or PyPI package footprint. Package-led rows are intentionally left incomplete rather than inferred.
Verdict
AutoGen (Microsoft) has the stronger current base on production adoption and installed base. The evidence is strongest in the adoption table, not just the brand narrative.
Production adoption
AutoGen (Microsoft) is the only company here with tracked package downloads at 57.9K/mo.
Installed base
AutoGen (Microsoft) is the only company here with a tracked dependent-package footprint.
Maintenance capacity
AutoGen (Microsoft) has the more active contributor base at 1 contributors/day.
Funding cushion
Harvey AI has the deeper disclosed funding base at $206M.
Package-based signals are limited for Harvey AI. Treat the production call as incomplete rather than definitive.
AutoGen (Microsoft) receives 57.9K npm+PyPI downloads/mo. Data as of April 4, 2026. Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index, ai-buzz.com/compare/autogen-vs-harvey-ai. Accessed April 4, 2026.
Share or inspect raw data
Share the comparison or open each company’s machine-readable record.
Compare metric trends across companies over time
Comparing PyPI Downloads over 30 days: AutoGen (Microsoft) (57.9K).
Source: PyPI (BigQuery) | Methodology | CC-BY-NC 4.0
| Date | AutoGen (Microsoft) | Harvey AI |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6 | 28.7K | - |
| Mar 13 | 22.8K | - |
| Mar 20 | 25.2K | - |
| Mar 27 | 18.9K | - |
| Apr 3 | 60.5K | - |
| Apr 4 | 57.9K | - |
