Aleph Alpha vs Meta Llama
both compete in Foundation Models. Updated daily with live metrics.
Aleph Alpha: 213.2K downloads/mo, 98 GitHub stars, $533M funded vs
Meta Llama
Source: AI-Buzz. Updated daily from npm, PyPI, GitHub, and Hacker News.
Key Differences
For production adoption: Aleph Alpha is depended on by 77 packages. Aleph Alpha has 213.2K package downloads per month. Aleph Alpha appears in 1.3K GitHub repositories.
For growth trajectory: Aleph Alpha has 98 GitHub stars.
For longevity/risk: Aleph Alpha has raised $533M in total disclosed funding. Aleph Alpha's most recent round was Series B. both companies operate in the Foundation Models category.
Bottom Line
Aleph Alpha leads on developer adoption with 213.2K monthly package downloads. Both compete in the Foundation Models space. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
Momentum (0-100)
Data freshness notice: Meta Llama: no data freshness timestamp available.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 17 | Meta Llama |
|---|---|---|
| Website | aleph-alpha.com → | llama.meta.com → |
| Description | European AI lab building large language models. | Meta's open-weight large language model family |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $533M✓ | N/A |
| Last Funding | Series B Nov 2023 | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 27✓ | N/A |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | N/A |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 213.2K✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | - | |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 213.2K-5%✓ | Not tracked |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 0 | N/A |
| Contributors Trend | -100% | - |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 77✓ | N/A |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forks | 1.3K✓ | N/A |
| Status | Private | Unknown |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 0 | N/A |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 98✓ | N/A |
| Founded | 2019 | Unknown |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | Unknown | |
* Meta Llama has no npm/PyPI packages tracked - download metrics unavailable. Signal score based on GitHub and community data only.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.