Anthropic vs Fireworks AI
Anthropic leads in package downloads at 7x; Anthropic has raised more funding at $58.7B; Anthropic leads in active contributors with 3 (30d); Anthropic leads in code adoption with 3.7K repos importing. Updated daily with live metrics.
Anthropic: 3.4M downloads/mo (+41%), 3.0K GitHub stars, 3 active contributors, 5.0K dependents, 3.7K repos importing, $58.7B funded vs
Fireworks AI: 467.3K downloads/mo (+18%), 137 GitHub stars, 2 active contributors, 1 repos importing, $77M funded
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Key Differences
For production adoption: Anthropic is depended on by 9.3K packages versus 49 for Fireworks AI. Anthropic leads in package downloads with 3.4M per month compared to 467.3K for Fireworks AI (Anthropic +41% MoM, Fireworks AI +18% MoM). Anthropic appears in 3.7K GitHub repositories compared to 1 for Fireworks AI.
For growth trajectory: Anthropic has 3.0K GitHub stars versus 137 for Fireworks AI. Anthropic received 324 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: Anthropic has raised $58.7B in total disclosed funding, while Fireworks AI has raised $77M. Anthropic's most recent round was Series G, while Fireworks AI's most recent round was Series A. Anthropic attracted 3 active contributors in the last 30 days compared to 2 for Fireworks AI. Anthropic operates in Foundation Models while Fireworks AI focuses on AI Infrastructure.
Bottom Line
Anthropic leads on developer adoption with 3.4M monthly package downloads. Fireworks AI counters with 137 GitHub stars, reflecting strong developer awareness. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 18 | Updated Mar 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Website | anthropic.com → | fireworks.ai → |
| Description | AI safety company behind the Claude model family | Fast and efficient generative AI inference platform |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $58.7B✓ | $77M |
| Last Funding | Series G Feb 2026 | Series A May 2024 |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 65Moderate✓ | 36Moderate |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | 0 |
| npm Trend (30d) | - | |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 3.4M✓ | 467.3K |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | ||
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 3.4M+41%✓ | 467.3K+18% |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 3✓ | 2 |
| Contributors Trend | +200% | - |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | 5.0K✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 4.3K✓ | 49 |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksExclusive | 3.7K✓ | 1 |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 47.8% of HN mentions | 0.7% of HN mentions |
| Status | Private | Unknown |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 324✓ | 0 |
| HN Mentions Trend (30d) | ||
| Reddit Mentions (30d) Source: Reddit (search API)Updates: DailyNote: Counts posts/comments mentioning the company by nameExclusive | 19✓ | 0 |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technologyExclusive | 8✓ | N/A |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 3.0K✓ | 137 |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which has more developer adoption, Anthropic or Fireworks AI?
- Anthropic has 3.4M package downloads per month, making it the more widely adopted tool among developers.Anthropic profile →
- Which has more real-world code adoption, Anthropic or Fireworks AI?
- Anthropic appears in 3.7K GitHub repositories that import its packages, compared to 1 for Fireworks AI. This metric is exclusive to AI-Buzz.How we measure code adoption →
- Which is mentioned more in job listings, Anthropic or Fireworks AI?
- Anthropic appeared in 8 job listings in the last 30 days, compared to 0 for Fireworks AI. Job mention data is tracked exclusively by AI-Buzz.How we track job mentions →
- Which is growing faster, Anthropic or Fireworks AI?
- Anthropic has a momentum score of 65/100, indicating strong growth trajectory. Momentum is calculated from download trends, GitHub activity, and community signals.Developer Adoption Index →
- Which company has more funding, Anthropic or Fireworks AI?
- Anthropic has raised $58.7B in total disclosed funding.AI funding data →
Download comparison data
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index. Free to use with attribution.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.