Anthropic vs Meta Llama
both compete in Foundation Models. Updated daily with live metrics.
Anthropic: 95.4M downloads/mo (+30%), 3.0K GitHub stars, 5 active contributors, 5.0K dependents, $58.7B funded vs
Meta Llama
Source: AI-Buzz. Updated daily from npm, PyPI, GitHub, and Hacker News.
Key Differences
For production adoption: Anthropic is depended on by 9.3K packages. Anthropic has 95.4M package downloads per month (+30% MoM). Anthropic appears in 3.7K GitHub repositories.
For growth trajectory: Anthropic has 3.0K GitHub stars. Anthropic received 4.2K Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: Anthropic has raised $58.7B in total disclosed funding. Anthropic's most recent round was Series G. both companies operate in the Foundation Models category.
Bottom Line
Anthropic leads on developer adoption with 95.4M monthly package downloads. Both compete in the Foundation Models space. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Data freshness notice: Meta Llama: no data freshness timestamp available.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 17 | Meta Llama |
|---|---|---|
| Website | anthropic.com → | llama.meta.com → |
| Description | AI safety company behind the Claude model family | Meta's open-weight large language model family |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $58.7B✓ | N/A |
| Last Funding | Series G Feb 2026 | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 65Moderate✓ | N/A |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 28.1M✓ | N/A |
| npm Trend (30d) | - | |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 67.2M✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | - | |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 95.4M+30%✓ | Not tracked |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 5✓ | N/A |
| Contributors Trend | +200%+ | - |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | 5.0K✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 4.3K✓ | N/A |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forks | 3.7K✓ | N/A |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 45.1% of HN mentions | - |
| Status | Private | Unknown |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 4.2K✓ | N/A |
| HN Mentions Trend (30d) | - | |
| Reddit Mentions (30d) Source: Reddit (search API)Updates: DailyNote: Counts posts/comments mentioning the company by name | 448✓ | N/A |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technology | 30✓ | N/A |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 3.0K✓ | N/A |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | Unknown | |
* Meta Llama has no npm/PyPI packages tracked - download metrics unavailable. Signal score based on GitHub and community data only.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.