AutoGen (Microsoft) vs Make
both compete in AI Agents. Updated daily with live metrics.
AutoGen (Microsoft): 1.1M downloads/mo (+30%), 55.8K GitHub stars, 1 active contributors vs
Make
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources.
Downloads (30d)
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Key Differences
For production adoption: AutoGen (Microsoft) is depended on by 75 packages. AutoGen (Microsoft) has 1.1M package downloads per month (+30% MoM).
For growth trajectory: AutoGen (Microsoft) has 55.8K GitHub stars. AutoGen (Microsoft) received 1 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days compared to 1 for Make.
For longevity/risk: both companies operate in the AI Agents category.
Bottom Line
AutoGen (Microsoft) leads on developer adoption with 1.1M monthly package downloads. Both compete in the AI Agents space. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Both companies compete in AI Agents. View all AI Agents companies →
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 18 | Updated Mar 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Website | microsoft.github.io/autogen/ → | make.com → |
| Description | Multi-agent conversation framework | Workflow automation platform. Formerly Integromat, now with AI features. |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | N/A | N/A |
| Last Funding | Not available | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | N/A | 50Moderate✓ |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | N/A |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 1.1M✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | - | |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 1.1M+30%✓ | Not tracked |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 1✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 75✓ | N/A |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksExclusive | 0 | N/A |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | - | 0.8% of HN mentions |
| Status | Unknown | Private |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 1✓ | 1 |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 55.8K✓ | N/A |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
* Make has no npm/PyPI packages tracked - download metrics unavailable. Signal score based on GitHub and community data only.
Download comparison data
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index. Free to use with attribution.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.