Fireworks AI vs LlamaIndex
Fireworks AI has raised more funding at $77M; Fireworks AI leads in active contributors with 2 (30d); LlamaIndex leads in code adoption with 1.5K repos importing. Updated daily with live metrics.
Fireworks AI: 467.3K downloads/mo (+18%), 137 GitHub stars, 2 active contributors, 1 repos importing, $77M funded vs
LlamaIndex: 452.5K downloads/mo (+26%), 47.8K GitHub stars, 1 active contributors, 111 dependents, 1.5K repos importing, $85K funded
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
Momentum (0-100)
Key Differences
For production adoption: LlamaIndex is depended on by 757 packages versus 49 for Fireworks AI. Fireworks AI leads in package downloads with 467.3K per month compared to 452.5K for LlamaIndex (Fireworks AI +18% MoM, LlamaIndex +26% MoM). LlamaIndex appears in 1.5K GitHub repositories compared to 1 for Fireworks AI.
For growth trajectory: LlamaIndex has 47.8K GitHub stars versus 137 for Fireworks AI.
For longevity/risk: Fireworks AI has raised $77M in total disclosed funding, while LlamaIndex has raised $85K. Fireworks AI's most recent round was Series B, while LlamaIndex's most recent round was Seed. Fireworks AI attracted 2 active contributors in the last 30 days compared to 1 for LlamaIndex. Fireworks AI operates in AI Infrastructure while LlamaIndex focuses on Foundation Models.
Bottom Line
Fireworks AI leads on developer adoption with 467.3K monthly package downloads. LlamaIndex counters with 47.8K GitHub stars, reflecting strong developer awareness. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 18 | Updated Mar 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Website | fireworks.ai → | llamaindex.ai → |
| Description | Fast and efficient generative AI inference platform | Framework for building LLM applications with RAG. Data framework for AI. |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $77M✓ | $85K |
| Last Funding | Series B Jul 2024 | Seed Jun 2023 |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 36Moderate | 47Moderate✓ |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | 0 |
| npm Trend (30d) | - | |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 467.3K✓ | 452.5K |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | ||
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 467.3K+18%✓ | 452.5K+26% |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 2✓ | 1 |
| Contributors Trend | - | -50% |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | N/A | 111✓ |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 49 | 646✓ |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksExclusive | 1 | 1.5K✓ |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 0.7% of HN mentions | 0.2% of HN mentions |
| Status | Unknown | Private |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 0 | 0 |
| Reddit Mentions (30d) Source: Reddit (search API)Updates: DailyNote: Counts posts/comments mentioning the company by nameExclusive | 0 | 2✓ |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technologyExclusive | N/A | 1✓ |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 137 | 47.8K✓ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which has more developer adoption, Fireworks AI or LlamaIndex?
- Fireworks AI has 467.3K package downloads per month, making it the more widely adopted tool among developers.Fireworks AI profile →
- Which has more real-world code adoption, Fireworks AI or LlamaIndex?
- LlamaIndex appears in 1.5K GitHub repositories that import its packages, compared to 1 for Fireworks AI. This metric is exclusive to AI-Buzz.How we measure code adoption →
- Which is mentioned more in job listings, Fireworks AI or LlamaIndex?
- LlamaIndex appeared in 1 job listings in the last 30 days, compared to 0 for Fireworks AI. Job mention data is tracked exclusively by AI-Buzz.How we track job mentions →
- Which is growing faster, Fireworks AI or LlamaIndex?
- LlamaIndex has a momentum score of 47/100, indicating moderate growth trajectory. Momentum is calculated from download trends, GitHub activity, and community signals.Developer Adoption Index →
- Which company has more funding, Fireworks AI or LlamaIndex?
- Fireworks AI has raised $77M in total disclosed funding.AI funding data →
Download comparison data
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index. Free to use with attribution.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.