MindsDB vs MLflow
both compete in AI Infrastructure. Updated daily with live metrics.
MindsDB: 11.6K downloads/mo (-16%), 38.8K GitHub stars, 4 active contributors, $51M funded vs
MLflow
Source: AI-Buzz. Updated daily from npm, PyPI, GitHub, and Hacker News.
Key Differences
For production adoption: MindsDB has 11.6K package downloads per month (-16% MoM). MindsDB appears in 75 GitHub repositories.
For growth trajectory: MindsDB has 38.8K GitHub stars. MindsDB received 1 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: MindsDB has raised $51M in total disclosed funding. MindsDB's most recent round was Venture. both companies operate in the AI Infrastructure category.
Bottom Line
MindsDB leads on developer adoption with 11.6K monthly package downloads. Both compete in the AI Infrastructure space. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Repos Importing (code adoption)
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Data freshness notice: MLflow: no data freshness timestamp available.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 17 | MLflow |
|---|---|---|
| Website | mindsdb.com → | mlflow.org → |
| Description | AI tables platform bringing ML models inside existing databases | Open-source platform for the ML lifecycle including experiment tracking and model registry |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $51M✓ | N/A |
| Last Funding | Venture Feb 2023 | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 37Moderate✓ | N/A |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | N/A |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 11.6K✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | - | |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 11.6K-16%✓ | Not tracked |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 4✓ | N/A |
| Contributors Trend | -69% | - |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 0 | N/A |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forks | 75✓ | N/A |
| Status | Private | Unknown |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 1✓ | N/A |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 38.8K✓ | N/A |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | Unknown | |
* MLflow has no npm/PyPI packages tracked - download metrics unavailable. Signal score based on GitHub and community data only.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.