Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads in npm + PyPI downloads at 8x; Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads in active contributors with 4 (30d); Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads in code adoption with 49.4K repos importing; Supabase leads in job demand with 5 mentions. Updated daily with live metrics.
Data sources: npm, PyPI, GitHub, Crunchbase, Hacker News, Reddit, job boards. Methodology →
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin): 16.7M npm + PyPI downloads/mo (+5% MoM), 27.3K GitHub stars, 4 active contributors, 49.4K repos importing, $17M funded vs
Supabase: 2.1M npm + PyPI downloads/mo, 99.5K GitHub stars, 1 active contributors, 3.0K dependents, 16.6K repos importing
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources. Methodology →
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads across 4 of 7 key metrics
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
For production adoption: Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) is depended on by 43.9K packages versus 3.4K for Supabase. Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads in package downloads with 16.7M per month compared to 2.1M for Supabase. Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) appears in 49.4K GitHub repositories compared to 16.6K for Supabase.
For growth trajectory: Supabase has 99.5K GitHub stars versus 27.3K for Pydantic (Samuel Colvin). Supabase received 3 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) has raised $17M in total disclosed funding. Pydantic (Samuel Colvin)'s most recent round was Series A. Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) attracted 4 active contributors in the last 30 days compared to 1 for Supabase. Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) operates in AI Infrastructure while Supabase focuses on Developer Tools.
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) leads on developer adoption with 16.7M monthly package downloads. Supabase counters with 99.5K GitHub stars. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 23 | Supabase Updated Mar 23 |
|---|---|---|
| Website | pydantic.dev → | supabase.com → |
| Description | Data validation library and AI agent framework | Open-source Firebase alternative built on Postgres |
| Data Confidence Source: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Composite score (0-100) based on field completeness, metric freshness, and identifier coverage. Higher = more reliable data.Methodology → | Excellent (91%) | Excellent (93%) |
| Signal Coverage Source: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Number of non-null adoption metrics tracked. Companies with more signals have more reliable composite scores.Methodology → | 4/7 metrics | 7/7 metrics |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: WeeklyMethodology → | $17M | - |
| Last Funding | Series A Feb 2024 | - |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 33Moderate | 60Moderate✓ |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | 0 | 1.7M✓ |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | 16.7M✓ | 442.4K |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | ||
| Total Downloads - npm + PyPI (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managersMethodology → | 16.7M+5%✓ | 2.1M |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activityMethodology → | 4✓ | 1 |
| Contributors Trend | +2 contributors | - |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependentsMethodology → | - | 3.0K |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPIMethodology → | 43.9K✓ | 392 |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksMethodology →Exclusive | 49.4K✓ | 16.6K |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary categoryMethodology → | - | 60% of HN mentions |
| Status | Private | Private |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyMethodology → | 0 | 3✓ |
| HN Mentions Trend (30d) | ||
| Reddit Mentions (30d) Source: Reddit (search API)Updates: DailyNote: Counts posts/comments mentioning the company by nameMethodology →Exclusive | 0 | 1✓ |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technologyMethodology →Exclusive | 1 | 5✓ |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicatorMethodology → | 27.3K | 99.5K✓ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
Data sources: npm, PyPI, GitHub, Crunchbase, Hacker News, Reddit, job boards. Methodology →
Licensed CC BY 4.0. Free to cite with attribution.
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.
Compare metric trends across companies over time
Comparing npm Downloads over 30 days: Supabase (1.7M).
Source: npm registry | Methodology | CC BY 4.0
| Date | Pydantic (Samuel Colvin) | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22 | - | 1.6M |
| Mar 23 | - | 1.7M |
