Cerebras vs MLflow
both compete in AI Infrastructure. Updated daily with live metrics.
Cerebras: 1.4M downloads/mo, 120 GitHub stars, 19 dependents, $710M funded vs
MLflow
Source: AI-Buzz. Updated daily from npm, PyPI, GitHub, and Hacker News.
Key Differences
For production adoption: Cerebras is depended on by 83 packages. Cerebras has 1.4M package downloads per month.
For growth trajectory: Cerebras has 120 GitHub stars. Cerebras received 76 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: Cerebras has raised $710M in total disclosed funding. Cerebras's most recent round was Series F. both companies operate in the AI Infrastructure category.
Bottom Line
Cerebras leads on developer adoption with 1.4M monthly package downloads. Both compete in the AI Infrastructure space. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Data freshness notice: MLflow: no data freshness timestamp available.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 17 | MLflow |
|---|---|---|
| Website | cerebras.ai → | mlflow.org → |
| Description | AI compute company with wafer-scale chips | Open-source platform for the ML lifecycle including experiment tracking and model registry |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $710M✓ | N/A |
| Last Funding | Series F Nov 2021 | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 30Moderate✓ | N/A |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 311.2K✓ | N/A |
| npm Trend (30d) | - | |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 1.1M✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | - | |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 1.4M-4%✓ | Not tracked |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 0 | N/A |
| Contributors Trend | -100% | - |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | 19✓ | N/A |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 64✓ | N/A |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forks | 0 | N/A |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 5.4% of HN mentions | - |
| Status | Unknown | Unknown |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 76✓ | N/A |
| HN Mentions Trend (30d) | - | |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technology | 2✓ | N/A |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 120✓ | N/A |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | Unknown | |
* MLflow has no npm/PyPI packages tracked - download metrics unavailable. Signal score based on GitHub and community data only.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.