Groq vs Open WebUI
Open WebUI leads in active contributors with 39 (30d). Updated daily with live metrics.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Website | groq.com → | openwebui.com → |
| Description | Fast inference for LLMs. Hardware-accelerated AI inference platform. | Open-source ChatGPT alternative. Self-hosted UI for LLMs. |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Crunchbase / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $650M✓ | - |
| Last Funding | Series D Aug 2024 | Not available |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum ⓘ | 32 | 36Moderate✓ |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 2.4M✓ | - |
| npm Trend (30d) | -3% | - |
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (pypistats.org)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 7.2M | 9.0M✓ |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | +30% | +40% |
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 9.6M+22%✓ | 9.0M+40% |
| Active Contributors (30d) Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 4 | 39✓ |
| Contributors Trend (30d) | - | +129% |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | 314✓ | - |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forks | 0 | 0 |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 9.5% of HN mentions | 0.2% of HN mentions |
| Status | Private | Private |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 146✓ | 11 |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 583 | 127.0K✓ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
Key Differences
For production adoption: Groq is depended on by 314 packages. Groq leads in package downloads with 9.6M per month compared to 9.0M for Open WebUI.
For growth trajectory: Open WebUI has 127.0K GitHub stars versus 583 for Groq. Groq received 146 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days compared to 11 for Open WebUI.
For longevity/risk: Groq has raised $650M in total disclosed funding. Groq's most recent round was Series D. Open WebUI attracted 39 active contributors in the last 30 days compared to 4 for Groq. Groq operates in AI Infrastructure while Open WebUI focuses on Foundation Models.
Bottom Line
Groq leads on developer adoption with 9.6M monthly package downloads. Open WebUI counters with 127.0K GitHub stars, reflecting strong developer awareness. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
Groq: 9.6M downloads/mo (+22%), 583 GitHub stars, 4 active contributors, 314 dependents, $650M funded vs
Open WebUI: 9.0M downloads/mo (+40%), 127.0K GitHub stars, 39 active contributors
Source: AI-Buzz. Updated daily from npm, PyPI, GitHub, and Hacker News.
- •Groq has 9.6M downloads/mo vs Open WebUI at 9.0M
- •Open WebUI has 127.0K GitHub stars (218x more)
- •Open WebUI has 39 active contributors (30d) (10x Groq)
- •Groq has raised $650M in disclosed funding; no funding data for Open WebUI
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.