Decision brief
Supabase is the safer production bet today.
Supabase has the stronger current base on production adoption and installed base. Qdrant still has the better short-term growth signal, so this is a stability call rather than a universal win.
Supabase leads in npm + PyPI downloads at 2x; Supabase leads in active contributors with 19 (30d); Supabase leads in npm dependents with 3.1K; Supabase leads in code adoption with 16.6K repos importing; Supabase leads in job demand with 5 mentions. Updated daily with live metrics.
Production adoption
Supabase leads at 1.7x on package downloads. Supabase is at 29.7M/mo.
Installed base
Supabase leads at 3.1x in dependent packages.
Code adoption
Supabase leads at 8.6x in repos importing tracked packages.
Maintenance capacity
Supabase has the more active contributor base at 19 contributors/day.
At a glance
Data sources: npm, PyPI, GitHub, Crunchbase, Hacker News, Reddit, job boards. Methodology →
Use this as the short, source-backed version of the call before you screenshot or cite the full table.
Qdrant: 17.1M npm + PyPI downloads/mo (+26% MoM), 29.9K GitHub stars, 6 active contributors, 286 dependents, 1.9K repos importing, $30M funded vs
Supabase: 29.7M npm + PyPI downloads/mo, 99.8K GitHub stars, 19 active contributors, 3.1K dependents, 16.6K repos importing
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources. Methodology →
Evidence Table
Production signals first, softer context second. Winner states are explicit, and weak or missing data stays visible instead of being rounded away.
← Scroll to compare columns →
| Signal | Current edge | Updated Mar 27 | Supabase Updated Mar 27 |
|---|---|---|---|
Adoption & EcosystemThese signals carry the most weight for a production default. | |||
| Momentum | Current edge Supabase +25 pts | 35 Moderate | 60 Moderate |
| Total package downloads (30d)Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managersMethodology → | Current edge Supabase 1.7x | 17.1M +26% | 29.7M (2 packages) |
| npm registry downloads (30d)Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | Current edge Supabase 16x | 1.5M | 24.1M (2 packages) |
| PyPI registry downloads (30d)Source: PyPI (pypistats.org)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrorsMethodology → | Current edge Qdrant 2.8x | 15.6M | 5.6M (2 packages) |
| Package dependentsSource: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Counts dependent packages across tracked npm and PyPI packages.Methodology → | Current edge Supabase 3.1x | 1.1K npm 286 · PyPI 826 | 3.5K npm 3.1K · PyPI 392 |
| Active contributors/daySource: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activityMethodology → | Current edge Supabase 3.2x | 6 -25% | 19 |
| Code adoption (repos)Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksMethodology →Exclusive | Current edge Supabase 8.6x | 1.9K | 16.6K |
Community & AttentionHelpful context, but weaker than the adoption rows above. | |||
| GitHub starsSource: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks - a popularity signal, not a usage indicatorMethodology → | Current edge Supabase 3.3x | 29.9K | 99.8K |
| Hacker News mentions (30d)Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyMethodology → | Current edge Even | 4 | 4 |
| HN discussion shareSource: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of Hacker News mentions within the company's primary category.Methodology → | Current edge Supabase +66 pts | 14.3% | 80% |
| Job mentions (30d)Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings that mention the company's technology.Methodology →Exclusive | Current edge Supabase 5.0x | 1 | 5 |
Company DurabilityCapital and financing history provide context, not the whole call. | |||
| Total disclosed fundingSource: Public records / manual researchUpdates: WeeklyMethodology → | Current edge Qdrant only | $30M | Not disclosed |
| Last funding round | Current edge Qdrant only | Series A Jan 2024 | Not disclosed |
Data TrustCoverage and freshness stay visible instead of being hidden by the narrative. | |||
| Data confidenceSource: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Composite score based on field completeness, metric freshness, and identifier coverage.Methodology → | Current edge Qdrant +4 pts | Excellent (98%) | Excellent (94%) |
| Signals trackedSource: AI-BuzzUpdates: DailyNote: Number of tracked non-null signals in the core compare dataset.Methodology → | Current edge Even | 6/7 adoption, attention, and trust signals | 6/7 adoption, attention, and trust signals |
| Latest sync | Current edge Same | Mar 27, 2026 | Mar 27, 2026 |
Use This Comparison
Keep the share and export tools next to the evidence. The table stays public, citable, and licensed under CC BY 4.0.
npm+PyPI downloads/mo: Supabase 29.7M vs Qdrant 17.1M. GitHub stars: Supabase 99.8K vs Qdrant 29.9K. npm dependents: Supabase 3.1K vs Qdrant 286. Data as of March 27, 2026. Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index, ai-buzz.com/compare/qdrant-vs-supabase. Accessed March 28, 2026.
Decision memo
Supabase has the stronger current base on production adoption and installed base. Qdrant still has the better short-term growth signal, so this is a stability call rather than a universal win.
As of March 2026, Supabase has the stronger current production footing, while Qdrant shows the faster growth signal.
Basis of the call
Production adoption
Supabase leads at 1.7x on package downloads. Supabase is at 29.7M/mo.
Installed base
Supabase leads at 3.1x in dependent packages.
Code adoption
Supabase leads at 8.6x in repos importing tracked packages.
Maintenance capacity
Supabase has the more active contributor base at 19 contributors/day.
your priority is $30M disclosed funding.
your priority is 29.7M package downloads/mo, 3.5K dependent packages and 16.6K repos importing.
FAQ
Select companies
Search for two to four companies, then open a decision brief with the same metrics on every side.
If you need a vendor brief, export, or citation-ready pack for an internal review, request custom help and tell us what decision is blocked.
Keep Comparing
Related Research
AI Devs Drop Chroma for Weaviate, Qdrant in Production
Mar 3, 2026
AI Devs Shift to Qdrant, Weaviate for Performance DBs
Mar 2, 2026
Qdrant Gains on Chroma in Vector DB Adoption, Data Shows
Mar 1, 2026
Vector DB Market Shifts: Qdrant, Chroma Challenge Milvus
Feb 25, 2026
Pinecone Acquisition Rumors: The Race to Own AI Memory
Aug 29, 2025
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.
Compare metric trends across companies over time
Comparing npm Downloads over 30 days: Supabase (2.9M), Qdrant (67.7K).
Source: npm registry | Methodology | CC BY 4.0
| Date | Qdrant | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | 44.1K | - |
| Mar 12 | 36.5K | - |
| Mar 19 | 32.6K | 1.6M |
| Mar 26 | 67.9K | 2.7M |
| Mar 27 | 67.7K | 2.9M |
