Cerebras vs Hugging Face
Hugging Face leads in package downloads at 127x; Cerebras has raised more funding at $710M; Hugging Face leads in npm dependents with 284; Cerebras leads in job demand with 2 mentions. Updated daily with live metrics.
Cerebras: 38.1K downloads/mo (-13%), 121 GitHub stars, 19 dependents, $710M funded vs
Hugging Face: 4.8M downloads/mo, 158.1K GitHub stars, 20 active contributors, 284 dependents, 33.0K repos importing, $394M funded
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index (DAI). Updated daily from 12 data sources.
Downloads (30d)
Disclosed Funding
GitHub Stars
Package Dependents
Repos Importing (code adoption)
HN Mentions (30d)
Momentum (0-100)
Key Differences
For production adoption: Hugging Face is depended on by 9.1K packages versus 83 for Cerebras. Hugging Face leads in package downloads with 4.8M per month compared to 38.1K for Cerebras (Cerebras -13% MoM). Hugging Face appears in 33.0K GitHub repositories.
For growth trajectory: Hugging Face has 158.1K GitHub stars versus 121 for Cerebras. Hugging Face received 15 Hacker News mentions in the last 30 days.
For longevity/risk: Cerebras has raised $710M in total disclosed funding, while Hugging Face has raised $394M. Cerebras's most recent round was Series F, while Hugging Face's most recent round was Series D. Cerebras operates in AI Infrastructure while Hugging Face focuses on Foundation Models.
Bottom Line
Hugging Face leads on developer adoption with 4.8M monthly package downloads. Cerebras counters with 121 GitHub stars, reflecting strong developer awareness. For a deeper look, visit each company's full profile for trend charts, funding rounds, and community sentiment data.
← Scroll to compare →
| Metric | Updated Mar 19 | Updated Mar 19 |
|---|---|---|
| Website | cerebras.ai → | huggingface.co → |
| Description | AI compute company with wafer-scale chips | Open-source ML platform hosting models, datasets, and Spaces |
| Total Disclosed Funding Source: Public records / manual researchUpdates: Weekly | $710M✓ | $394M |
| Last Funding | Series F Nov 2021 | Series D Aug 2023 |
| Developer Adoption | ||
| Momentum | 28 | 41Moderate✓ |
| npm Registry Downloads (30d) Source: npm registryUpdates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 0 | 0 |
| npm Trend (30d) | ||
| PyPI Registry Downloads (30d) Source: PyPI (Google BigQuery)Updates: DailyNote: Includes all package installations including CI/CD pipelines and mirrors | 38.1K | 4.8M✓ |
| PyPI Trend (30d) | ||
| Total Downloads (30d) Source: npm + PyPI registriesUpdates: DailyNote: Sum of npm and PyPI; excludes other package managers | 38.1K-13% | 4.8M+2%✓ |
| Active Contributors/Day Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Tracks designated public repos per company, not all company GitHub activity | 0 | 20✓ |
| Contributors Trend | - | +82% |
| npm Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct and dev dependents | 19 | 284✓ |
| PyPI Dependents Source: Libraries.io APIUpdates: WeeklyNote: Counts direct reverse dependencies from PyPI | 64 | 8.8K✓ |
| Code Adoption (repos) Source: ecosyste.ms Packages APIUpdates: DailyNote: Approximate count; excludes forksExclusive | 0 | 33.0K✓ |
| HN Discussion Share Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: DailyNote: Share of HN mentions within the company's primary category | 3.9% of HN mentions | 3.5% of HN mentions |
| Status | Unknown | Private |
| HN Mentions (30d) Source: Hacker News (Algolia API)Updates: Daily | 0 | 15✓ |
| HN Mentions Trend (30d) | ||
| Reddit Mentions (30d) Source: Reddit (search API)Updates: DailyNote: Counts posts/comments mentioning the company by nameExclusive | 0 | 16✓ |
| Job Mentions (30d) Source: Job board aggregationUpdates: DailyNote: Counts job listings mentioning the company's technologyExclusive | 2✓ | 2 |
| GitHub Stars Source: GitHub APIUpdates: DailyNote: Stars are bookmarks — a popularity signal, not a usage indicator | 121 | 158.1K✓ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Primary Category | ||
| Data Last Updated | ||
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which has more developer adoption, Cerebras or Hugging Face?
- Hugging Face has 4.8M package downloads per month, making it the more widely adopted tool among developers.Hugging Face profile →
- Which has more real-world code adoption, Cerebras or Hugging Face?
- Hugging Face appears in 33.0K GitHub repositories that import its packages, compared to 0 for Cerebras. This metric is exclusive to AI-Buzz.How we measure code adoption →
- Which is mentioned more in job listings, Cerebras or Hugging Face?
- Cerebras appeared in 2 job listings in the last 30 days, compared to 2 for Hugging Face. Job mention data is tracked exclusively by AI-Buzz.How we track job mentions →
- Which is growing faster, Cerebras or Hugging Face?
- Hugging Face has a momentum score of 41/100, indicating moderate growth trajectory. Momentum is calculated from download trends, GitHub activity, and community signals.Developer Adoption Index →
- Which company has more funding, Cerebras or Hugging Face?
- Cerebras has raised $710M in total disclosed funding.AI funding data →
Download comparison data
Source: AI-Buzz Developer Adoption Index. Free to use with attribution.
Select Companies to Compare
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Cerebras PyPI Downloads Surge 27%: A Leading AI Indicator
Mar 4, 2026
Perplexity pplx-embed: SOTA Open-Source Models for RAG
Feb 27, 2026
Pydantic vs OpenAI Adoption: The Real AI Infrastructure
Feb 25, 2026
Zhipu GLM-5 Escalates China AI Race: Scale vs Efficiency
Feb 11, 2026
NVIDIA's Hyper Moore's Law, AI Computing Power Doubles Every Six Months
Mar 20, 2025
Weekly AI Intelligence
Which AI companies are developers actually adopting? We track npm and PyPI downloads for hundreds of companies. Get the biggest shifts delivered weekly.